4 ms·
Anecdotally, the HF (shortwave) bands are on fire, lately. There's a lot of activity compared to 10 and 20 years ago. Broadcast and amateurs experimenting wit
by retrac 4y ago
Anecdotally, the HF (shortwave) bands are on fire, lately. There's a lot of activity compared to 10 and 20 years ago. Broadcast and amateurs experimenting with digital HF. Also weird stuff. Just the other day I saw a very low rate OFDM signal emitting ~1 kHz wide AM tones several seconds long, across ~500 kHz of spectrum. Visible from receivers in Iceland and Australia. Unless regulations have changed recently, I'm pretty sure that mode is illegal in most countries for amateur radio operators. Could be military or government? If not, they're likely operating illegally. And they want to send a few bits per second, very reliably, probably global coverage with a cheap receiver. And the Internet isn't appropriate for that task.
In recent years, with signal processing, it has become possible to communicate, at very low speeds over HF with downright trivial equipment. 100 milliwatts or so, from a simple one-transistor sort of transmitter, running at say 0.1 or 0.01 baud, can go across the continent with a wire hanging out the window. With the right coding, software-defined radio can pick that kind of signal out from beneath the noise floor.
Similarly, with higher frequencies like UHF, the cost has come down to the point that individuals, or small groups, could construct their own large-area mesh networks. A dozen LoRa radios with microcontrollers, placed strategically, could cover a large urban area. $1000? Something like that.
It will also soon be possible for a small organization, or even an individual, to construct a satellite-based data network. Cubesats can be launched for just thousands of dollars each. It's possible to communicate with such satellites using readily-available and relatively cheap equipment. Someone will eventually realize they can launch some dozens of such cheap satellites, and have their own global low-bandwidth network. A new startup, Swarm, has already launched their first set of smartphone-sized satellites, which collect beacon/telemetry data.
I suppose my overall point is that low-bitrate radio at distance is getting easier and cheaper over time. And being able to send even 1000 bits per second between many points in an urban area between mobile devices, like LoRa-based mesh networks can do, would be a very valuable asset for an individual or organization to have, if normal communications were disrupted. Unlike a giant 10 kilowatt HF transmitter in the old days, it's kind of hard to pin down where the equipment even is, or what it's for, or who is using it. Once the cost is cheap enough, nodes in such a network are effectively disposable. Place and forget. This will be an upset for those who assume that if Internet access is controlled, most or all potential communication channels are controlled.
- humanizersequel 4y agoDo you have any reading material about this? Intriguing concept.
- retrac 4y agoThe ham radio folks have a hobby called QRP / QRS. Low-power operation. I think the idea is to go the farthest, the slowest, with the least power. The WSPR project uses low-power beacons to study radio propagation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WSPR_(amateur_radio_software) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WSPR_(amateur_radio_software) You can buy kits that transmit beacons quite a ways for like $50. Or build one from a few parts in the bin and a microcontroller with GPIO pins. Need a licence for any real output power, of course. On LoRa networks: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7435450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7435450/ And an open-source implementation of one: https://meshtastic.org/ https://meshtastic.org/ LoRa gives several kilometres, practically, in an urban area, with a little coil of wire as an antenna. It uses unlicensed spectrum at legal power limits. It will go much further if given decent antennas and if raised up in a good location. LoRa modules are $10 - $20. A brick-sized box, on top of a tall building, or a pole on a hill. It's standard mesh networking, just quite slow, low power, and long-range. As for SDR: https://wiki.gnuradio.org/index.php/SuggestedReading https://wiki.gnuradio.org/index.php/SuggestedReading
- a9h74j 4y agoPre cell phones, when wireless pagers were important, I used to wonder: What if everyone had their own 1-baud worth of spectrum.
- BonoboIO 4y agoWith 100 Milliwatt around the continent, wow, that’s crazy. Would be interesting to see, what wallstreet would do with it. Light speed in Fibre is Slow than RF, they are buying towers for direct connections via RF. For low bandwidth, but time critical signals this could be a thing. But what do I know :D
- retrac 4y ago