3 ms·
Unless Google successfully removed online evidence, that simply doesn’t seem to be correct. A more nuanced and accurate description of the change seems to be w
by noizejoy 4y ago
Unless Google successfully removed online evidence, that simply doesn’t seem to be correct.
A more nuanced and accurate description of the change seems to be written up here:
https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-dont-be-evil/254019/ https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-dont-be-evil/2540...
- zzz345345 4y agohttps://gizmodo.com/google-removes-nearly-all-mentions-of-dont-be-evil-from-1826153393 https://gizmodo.com/google-removes-nearly-all-mentions-of-do...
- SquareWheel 4y agoThat article is specifically called out as being misleading and clickbaity by Search Engine Journal. I don't see what linking it again is adding to the conversation. >There have been click-baity news reports stating that “Google Removes ‘Don’t Be Evil’ Clause From Its Code of Conduct” but that is not entirely accurate. >Google has not removed that clause. Google has removed it from the preface, resulting in more attention to the word respect. But it still remains at the end of the document as before.
- zzz345345 4y ago[flagged]