<< If I used it and found it useful, does that make me a criminal? >> Probably whoever's on the other side of the transaction is. If you bought your BTC on lo

<< If I used it and found it useful, does that make me a criminal? >> Probably whoever's on the other side of the transaction is. If you bought your BTC on localbitcoins you probably got them from a money launderer for instance. Nootropic companies are the most legal crypto users I'm aware of. I did buy mine from Paypal so you might be onto something. << Criminals aren't very smart. If they were, they wouldn't be criminals, which is a very low-paying career. Um. I would maybe call it a reverse survivor bias. As for the low paying claim, I suppose it depends on other factors, but we are currently commenting on an article, which discusses sums upwards of millions of dollars. Reality is refuting that claim unless you want to include everyone with a felony in that circle ( technically accurate, but I personally think financial fraud is its own world that lives outside petty criminal circles ). I am open to rebuttal. << The regular financial system doesn't need to be 100% immune to hacking because it can undo transactions. Hmm. It technically can, but, for example, as some people in fraud cases unfortunately found out, once wire is sent out, getting it back is not as simple as pressing a button even for institutions within the same jurisdiction. You are not exactly wrong, but you are not right about it either. I will admit that this is a first time I see that stated this way and I am a little confused. In a very practical sense, nothing is 100% immune if history is any indicator. If my router is hacked, the fact that I revert it to its prior state makes ok? The original issue remains in place. I am sorry, it is just an odd argument to make. Can you elaborate on what you meant?