2 ms·

If they actually cared about their use of public land or what they were doing, then the _very least_ they could have done is put their name and phone number on

If they actually cared about their use of public land or what they were doing, then the _very least_ they could have done is put their name and phone number on it. They didn't. So, yes, it absolutely gets destroyed. If you fail to take responsibility for your actions, you can generally expect this to be the outcome.

mihaaly 4y ago
Oi, we talk about some miniscule thing out of the way of anyone and anything in the middle of deserted nowhere left alone to be destroyed by the elements eventually. What 'thing' (harm, gain, obstruction, damage, whatever) one should take resposibility for for god's sake? Not anyone knows that! But must be prety bad and taken down, no, not enoug, destroyed!, by expedition with areal photography because we have absolutely no clue! But at least because no paper trail is there, scandalous, very scandalous, outrage, very bad! Leaving small things out alone in the middle of nowhere not in the way of or observable effect on the public without paperwork, must be destroyed promptly! No questions asked, send the troops! : )
- akira2501 4y ago
  > one should take resposibility for for god's sake? Not anyone knows that! For one, it will not be "destroyed by the elements." It will "pollute the environment." It also has batteries in it. You are intentionally being obtuse to defend this point. These aren't 10,000 year old cave paintings, this is a modern piece of equipment, possibly being put to use to profit someone at the expense of everyone. > But at least because no paper trail is there, scandalous, very scandalous, outrage, very bad! There's only one point of view expressing "outrage" here. Do you share this same resentment for the people that voluntarily clean the sides of highways?
  - userbinator 4y ago
    I can imagine 10000 years ago, someone complaining about graffiti in the caves in much the same way as you are doing now.

mihaaly 4y ago

Oi, we talk about some miniscule thing out of the way of anyone and anything in the middle of deserted nowhere left alone to be destroyed by the elements eventually. What 'thing' (harm, gain, obstruction, damage, whatever) one should take resposibility for for god's sake? Not anyone knows that! But must be prety bad and taken down, no, not enoug, destroyed!, by expedition with areal photography because we have absolutely no clue! But at least because no paper trail is there, scandalous, very scandalous, outrage, very bad! Leaving small things out alone in the middle of nowhere not in the way of or observable effect on the public without paperwork, must be destroyed promptly! No questions asked, send the troops! : )

akira2501 4y ago
> one should take resposibility for for god's sake? Not anyone knows that! For one, it will not be "destroyed by the elements." It will "pollute the environment." It also has batteries in it. You are intentionally being obtuse to defend this point. These aren't 10,000 year old cave paintings, this is a modern piece of equipment, possibly being put to use to profit someone at the expense of everyone. > But at least because no paper trail is there, scandalous, very scandalous, outrage, very bad! There's only one point of view expressing "outrage" here. Do you share this same resentment for the people that voluntarily clean the sides of highways?
- userbinator 4y ago
  I can imagine 10000 years ago, someone complaining about graffiti in the caves in much the same way as you are doing now.