22 ms·
- We do not know what it is and for what, it just stands there, so we must destroy it! Nice! : /
by mihaaly 4y ago
- We do not know what it is and for what, it just stands there, so we must destroy it!
Nice! : /
- googlryas 4y agoWell, yes. You can't just erect stuff on public land willy nilly.
- mihaaly 4y agoRight, right, people are not supposed to build a dam or a T-shirt factory wherever they please but a small device left in the middle of nowhere difficult to find and comprehend, out of the way and sight literally for everyone, well, next time I will think twice if I make a small rock formation or a tent made of branches against rain in a nice hidden spot without proper signed permission from the authorities, erected on public land.
- InCityDreams 4y ago>well, next time I will think twice if I make a small rock formation or a tent made of branches against rain in a nice hidden spot "Leave nature as you found it"? Making shelter seems fair enough, but those fucking rock 'formations' are just narcissistic environment destroyers.
- mihaaly 4y ago> environment destroyers ...ok. The shelter erected may sound fair enough only before knowing that it has no permission! Must not be acceptable without the proper paperwork for a sensible person.
- eyelidlessness 4y agoPlease keep making little rock formations unless it’s explicitly verboten. I love seeing them, they’re delightful little surprises even on the roadside on interstate road trips. Please also continue to shelter yourself as needed, again unless your presence is explicitly verboten, or if you just need to survive. Those are excellent examples of good use of public land, and mostly explicitly verboten is key. Otherwise the land is for your use the same as it is for anyone else.
- akira2501 4y agoIf they actually cared about their use of public land or what they were doing, then the _very least_ they could have done is put their name and phone number on it. They didn't. So, yes, it absolutely gets destroyed. If you fail to take responsibility for your actions, you can generally expect this to be the outcome.
- mihaaly 4y agoOi, we talk about some miniscule thing out of the way of anyone and anything in the middle of deserted nowhere left alone to be destroyed by the elements eventually. What 'thing' (harm, gain, obstruction, damage, whatever) one should take resposibility for for god's sake? Not anyone knows that! But must be prety bad and taken down, no, not enoug, destroyed!, by expedition with areal photography because we have absolutely no clue! But at least because no paper trail is there, scandalous, very scandalous, outrage, very bad! Leaving small things out alone in the middle of nowhere not in the way of or observable effect on the public without paperwork, must be destroyed promptly! No questions asked, send the troops! : )
- akira2501 4y ago> one should take resposibility for for god's sake? Not anyone knows that! For one, it will not be "destroyed by the elements." It will "pollute the environment." It also has batteries in it. You are intentionally being obtuse to defend this point. These aren't 10,000 year old cave paintings, this is a modern piece of equipment, possibly being put to use to profit someone at the expense of everyone. > But at least because no paper trail is there, scandalous, very scandalous, outrage, very bad! There's only one point of view expressing "outrage" here. Do you share this same resentment for the people that voluntarily clean the sides of highways?
- userbinator 4y agoI can imagine 10000 years ago, someone complaining about graffiti in the caves in much the same way as you are doing now.
- ElfinTrousers 4y agoI think you meant to say "Someone left litter here. I'll pick it up."
- mihaaly 4y agoI ment to say we don't know what it is and actually said it.
- ElfinTrousers 4y agoNo, that doesn't sound right.