> All processes (criminal justice or otherwise) have error rates - yet not all anecdotal stories are covered Normally this is a correct take on AI criticism; h

> All processes (criminal justice or otherwise) have error rates - yet not all anecdotal stories are covered Normally this is a correct take on AI criticism; how many car crashes do the news report versus a not-so-self-driving car? But with policing, at least in the US, the past 10 years has been a continuous cycle of reporting and discussion about traditional analog false positive errors in policing, which often correlate with race. Over the past 10 years, I don't think there is another sector of decision-making that has been subjected to as much scrutiny as analog policing in the US.