2 ms·
I’m getting criticized a lot for noticing that the nature of our work has changed. I suggest that we simply converse on the topic, but I guess it sounds like B
by b33j0r 4y ago
I’m getting criticized a lot for noticing that the nature of our work has changed.
I suggest that we simply converse on the topic, but I guess it sounds like BS to people.
Heed my warning, you can get a model of our career to write any program you can phrase. I’m telling you, for you.
- binarymax 4y agoDid you actually use the source suggested and get it running somewhere?
- alexeldeib 4y agoChatGPT is generative word salad with high accuracy. Your previous comment was somewhat doom and gloom without providing interesting content for discussion — like the conversation, output, and a running example as a peer mentioned. There wasn’t much interesting to discuss which hadn’t been said about chatgpt already. Fwiw, I think it’s a force multiplier, not a replacement. It requires skill to determine the quality of the output, can raise the bar of inexperienced developers by producing output more quickly and accurately than they could, empowers experienced developers by generating boilerplate faster than they can, and can improve learning by providing examples for specific use cases. But when it’s wrong, it has no idea. It often answers riddles with intuitive but wrong answers. It provides code that doesn’t compile. Explains answers with logic that is entirely wrong. Push it and you’ll see. It’s impressive but not apocalyptic. See another highly ranked post on the idea of “AGI hard” if you think I’m moving goalposts.