I really get a kick out of this thinking, because there's literally no alternative from the employer's point of view. If you want to hire someone to do a job, y

I really get a kick out of this thinking, because there's literally no alternative from the employer's point of view. If you want to hire someone to do a job, you have to teach them how to do the job. To impose punitive measures after-the-fact because someone taught you how to do a job that they needed you to do seems hilarious even on the face of it. To be clear, saying "You're not allowed to use our IP or our machinery or our supplies" is totally reasonable; if I quit Starbucks, then of course I won't have Starbucks machines or merch. To say that you're not allowed to do something because they happened to be the ones to train you seems just silly. I get very strong middle-school vibes, where you introduce your friend-from-another-school to your group, then get mad when they become better friends with someone else than they are with you.