3 ms·
Stanford distances itself from now-viral ‘harmful language’ list
- metadat 4y agoRelated discussion from 2 weeks ago: Stanford's “Elimination of Harmful Language” Initiative https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34039816 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34039816 (843 points, 1800 comments)
- sourcecodeplz 4y agoYeah, that list was quite enlightening for me as a non-native English speaker but some did feel quite ridiculous. Edit: does anyone have the list? because going to http://web.archive.org/web/20221219160303/https://itcommunity.stanford.edu/ehli http://web.archive.org/web/20221219160303/https://itcommunit... loads the page but the actual terms don't show up. just the sections. This is why I say we should all have personal archives, sometimes not even they waybackmachine can help. 2nd edit: it looks like the information is there in the page, you just have to use view-source
- cuteboy19 4y agoEven if someone agreed with the premise of censorship or deplaforming, the list itself was very absurd. It was very arbitrary in that several common words were banned but chosen seemingly at random. Moreover, there was no ordering to the bans meaning "possibly offensive in an alternate universe" words were grouped with "even racists won't say this!" words
- cuteboy19 4y agoWhy not original link https://itcommunity.stanford.edu/news/update-elimination-harmful-language-initiative-stanfords-it-community https://itcommunity.stanford.edu/news/update-elimination-har...
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]