3 ms·
Two things: first, are you referring to a regulation and saying that another regulation is inconsistent? It seems that neither is making "law" in the sense of
by projektfu 4y ago
Two things: first, are you referring to a regulation and saying that another regulation is inconsistent? It seems that neither is making "law" in the sense of an act of Congress. It would be different if the law had its own definition.
Second, your citation appears to be out of date and the current regulation defines "frame or receiver" differently.
- notch656c 4y agoATF acts are not congress acts. Brilliant statement. No one is saying ATF is congress, so by definition their act is not an act of congress. >Second, your citation appears to be out of date and the current regulation defines "frame or receiver" differently. At the time of US v Rowald there were pretty clear inconsistancies. If you're referring to recent changes there's barely been enough time to create a historical record as the judicial process is slow, so it seems kind of silly to constrain to only post-latest change examples.