4 ms·
I assume they either make money or plan to make money from it. And as long as it’s optional I guess it’s fine BUT why not give a little cut to those who provide
by alkonaut 4y ago
I assume they either make money or plan to make money from it. And as long as it’s optional I guess it’s fine BUT why not give a little cut to those who provide images in the form of a reduced fee?
- Gigachad 4y agoThis is almost certainly illegal under the gdpr because it’s effectively charging users money to opt for privacy.
- alkonaut 4y agoDoesn’t feel very clear cut. It the images aren’t kept after they are fed into training, then it’s hard to say where there is PII stored. Selling privacy for money is legal, that’s what every store membership card where you get a member rebate does (in which case they of course associate all your purchases with the account).