3 ms·
No-one is invading your privacy here. If you choose to hand your personal details over to a pornographer, that's on you. You don't have to watch online porn. I
by noabuseplease 4y ago
No-one is invading your privacy here. If you choose to hand your personal details over to a pornographer, that's on you.
You don't have to watch online porn. If you do, any impact to privacy is your own fault.
- charonn0 4y agoWould you feel this way if it were church attendance instead of porn?
- noabuseplease 4y agoWhy would churches be required to record the personal details of everyone who attends?
- charonn0 4y agoWhy would porn sites?
- noabuseplease 4y agoIs that a trick question? We're discussing this on a post about a law that requires ID to be provided to online pornography sites to verify age.
- charonn0 4y agoI'm asking whether you only apply this logic to things you disapprove of.
- noabuseplease 4y agoIf I was religious and a churchgoer, and the church had a good reason to check my ID upon entry and record attendance, then yes I'd probably accept it as a condition of attending. Though I can't imagine what rationale there would be to start requiring churches to do this.
- charonn0 4y agoFor example, to protect impressionable children from exposure to it. Same as the stated rationale for the porn law.