That's a fair criticism, it might be me gatekeeping. To explain myself, these are specifically my pain points with Auto's repo: 1) No stable releases or versi

That's a fair criticism, it might be me gatekeeping. To explain myself, these are specifically my pain points with Auto's repo: 1) No stable releases or versioning. This makes it difficult to use, as any given pull of the repo could be in a broken state. A better alternative is to, at the very least, tag known working commits. 2) Lack of testing; this is related to above. Even basic tests that would stop things like LDSR from randomly breaking would be a huge boost in usability. 3) Easier to use UI. This isn't a huge thing; Auto's UI is fine, though some better guides and documentation would be nice. But InvokeAI's UI and default settings are much better, in my opinion. 4) Lack of an official Dockerfile. It's nicer to have things in one place, especially to keep them in lockstep with code changes. 5) Association with racism. When I said "professionally maintained" I didn't mean to imply maintained by a business or some other sort of gatekeeping. Though I can see how it read that way, and I appreciate your comment on it. Instead I just mean things like the above, which other projects are getting right. They just don't yet have the feature set of Auto's project.