3 ms·
It was more meant as a joke than a "trick question" calling them out as a "hypocrite". No need to infer nefarious intentions on my part. That said, swearing by
by dEnigma 4y ago
It was more meant as a joke than a "trick question" calling them out as a "hypocrite". No need to infer nefarious intentions on my part.
That said, swearing by a particular "course of action" and thinking it superior to other approaches is a "value" in my opinion.
- skmurphy 4y agoIf there is a value implicit seeing to gather disconfirming evidence by asking the decision maker what would change their mind, it seems to me to be a commitment to the scientific method of allowing new data to overturn existing models and hypotheses. My apologies if I imputed motives in your question that were not there. I am curious: what would you do if you were facing a high stakes situation where another person's decision was going to have a material impact on your life? How would you go about trying to change their decision?
- dEnigma 4y agoSure, "commitment to the scientific method" is also a "value", if we want to be abstract like that. Regarding your question: Depends on how much impact on my life it would have, and what exactly the decision is. I have no prepared strategies to change people's minds apart from presenting reasonable arguments and maybe slightly bullshitting my way through it at times. There was never a need for more than that. In the extreme the response would be lies and even violence, if nothing else works, I suppose. Again, it depends on what the situation and "material impact" on my life is.