Sorry, bad phrasing on my part. I didn't mean that peer reviewing doesn't lead to gatekeeping, but that simply making something peer reviewed isn't enough, beca

Sorry, bad phrasing on my part. I didn't mean that peer reviewing doesn't lead to gatekeeping, but that simply making something peer reviewed isn't enough, because ludicrously bad attempts at science can be peer reviewed. Peer review is also obviously a bad solution for the reproducibility problem, given that we've got the problem now, concurrent with generations of peer reviewed manuscripts.