4 ms·
I disagree. They both have the potential to cause serious harm in different ways. Candy is more destructive physically. It's everywhere. No one parent has the
by nerdawson 4y ago
I disagree. They both have the potential to cause serious harm in different ways.
Candy is more destructive physically. It's everywhere. No one parent has the power to stop it, so it makes sense for the state to do so.
- silent_cal 4y agoYou really think candy is more destructive for a kid than pornography? One can scar them for life, the other dissolves and goes away. You are not being realistic at all
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- CogitoCogito 4y agoAll of this is anecdote/opinion for both of us, but I'd say obesity is incomparably worse for society than porn.
- thepasswordis 4y agoDo you feel the same way about other forms of child sexual abuse? Like for instance if a kid gets abused only one time is that about the equivalent in your mind to them eating one piece of chocolate on the scale of things which can have long term effects on their life?
- silent_cal 4y agoIt’s obviously not even close to the same