3 ms·
I agree with you. I think the response you are getting is from people that have not seen how kids are being exposed to porn at younger and younger ages. We are
by friedman23 4y ago
I agree with you. I think the response you are getting is from people that have not seen how kids are being exposed to porn at younger and younger ages. We are doing an insane social experiment on the next generation because this kind of access to sexual content has not existed for all of human history.
- alphabettsy 4y ago> people that have not seen how kids are being exposed to porn at younger and younger ages. We are doing an insane social experiment on the next generation because this kind of access to sexual content has not existed for all of human history. Citations needed. Personally first saw porn when friends and I found a VHS tape around Grade 5. Many of my friends seem to have had similar experiences with finding VHS, DVD or Magazines around.
- friedman23 4y ago> Citations needed. What citations are needed? This is obviously materially different than you finding some vhs that you can only watch at specific times when your parents aren't home. Children have unlimited access to every single type of pornography and can watch it whenever they are left alone in their room with a computer or phone. edit: "Citations needed" is an extremely lazy way to respond to an argument that is extremely counterproductive and almost every time it's used it's done in bad faith to derail the conversation.
- alphabettsy 4y agoCitation needed that children are being exposed to sex younger than ever. Citation needed that internet porn is more harmful than a magazine or VHS. I think it’s counterproductive to try to shield young people from everything instead of teach. The same people encouraging things like this are almost a complete overlap with those pushing to eliminate sex ed.