> Driving needs some intelligence which is a bit generic but still different to other general intelligences, so it is not AGI-hard. For automated driving to be

> Driving needs some intelligence which is a bit generic but still different to other general intelligences, so it is not AGI-hard. For automated driving to be acceptable within society it is going have to be at least as good as an average human driver. In an urban street most non-speeding human drivers will see a child with a puppy off the lead and will understand that that child will be very likely to run after the puppy if it jumps into the road (And will most likely slow down in anticipation). AGI, according to Wikipedia, is "the ability of an intelligent agent to understand or learn any intellectual task that a human being can". How in general can an automated driving perform as well as a system with a human in the loop if it does not richly model human behaviour, i.e. achieve AGI?