3 ms·
Technically the parent’s point still stands - this is an informational RFC, not a standard.
by docandrew 4y ago
Technically the parent’s point still stands - this is an informational RFC, not a standard.
- richardwhiuk 4y agoIt's also documented in Section 4.6.7 of WHATWG's HTML 5 standard if that makes you happier - https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/links.html#linkTypes https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/links.html#linkTypes
- docandrew 4y agoDoesn’t really make me happier or unhappier, was merely making a point that RFCs come in different flavors, only one of which is a “standard” [1]. Not sure why it touched a nerve with so many people. 1. https://www.ietf.org/standards/rfcs/ https://www.ietf.org/standards/rfcs/
- richardwhiuk 4y agoIn practice, all RFCs are standards documents.