3 ms·
SourceHut as a solution to centralized censorship is...questionable. SourceHut bans anything blockchain/crypto related from their platform.
by dist1ll 4y ago
SourceHut as a solution to centralized censorship is...questionable.
SourceHut bans anything blockchain/crypto related from their platform.
- bayindirh 4y ago> SourceHut as a solution to centralized censorship is...ironic. It's not a solution to a centralized censorship. You can self-host it if you want. > SourceHut literally bans anything blockchain/crypto related from their platform. It's their platform, they can decide what to do with it. However, I support SourceHut's view on this, because I also didn't see anything useful came out of blockchain/cryptocurrency scene. Moreover, you can send your project in for vetting if you are so sure that it's something really beneficial. The ban is not a curtain / we'll ban you no matter what variety. To directly cite: > We will exercise discretion when applying this rule. If you believe that your use-case for cryptocurrency or blockchain is not plagued by these social problems, you may ask for permission to host it on SourceHut, or appeal its removal, by contacting support. [0] [0]: https://sourcehut.org/blog/2022-10-31-tos-update-cryptocurrency/ https://sourcehut.org/blog/2022-10-31-tos-update-cryptocurre...
- jamespo 4y agocan't they just do that development on the blockchain itself?
- bayindirh 4y agoGit is the original blockchain, actually. :D Just distribute it to many hosts, and you're done. Post-commit hooks on one server can do that with no effort. A TV company built a CDN like that. They pushed the data to Git, and it propagated in a fanning out fashion.