A peer review young earth creationist journal would still gatekeep anything that did not come from a young earth perspective. >Papers can be in any scientific,

A peer review young earth creationist journal would still gatekeep anything that did not come from a young earth perspective. >Papers can be in any scientific, or social scientific, field, but must be from a young-earth perspective and aim to assist the development of the creation model of origins The problem is that inherently peer review is designed to act as a brake: >Peer review, in which a scientist's paper is scrutinized by a group of colleagues, is designed to find errors and weed out half-baked ideas. But in blocking you are going to reject ideas. >And although some have criticized peer review for rejecting new ideas just because they're too radical for the establishment to stomach How much of a problem and how many revolutionary ideas are stopped, I don't know. I am more concerned about the reproducibility problem in science.