> Because these religious texts are hardly orimary sources that state historical facts, You're overgeneralizing. The Bible is effectively something like an ant

> Because these religious texts are hardly orimary sources that state historical facts, You're overgeneralizing. The Bible is effectively something like an anthology compiled from texts written in different styles over thousands of years. The character of Genesis is quite different from, say, the New Testament Gospels. While Genesis is not intended to be a scientific text, the New Testament does describe events in a historical kind of manner. > they are closer to pure propaganda pieces. I have no idea what that means. You should probably revisit your assumptions.