48 ms·
Slack communicated about the breach here: https://slack.com/blog/news/slack-security-update https://slack.com/blog/news/slack-security-update There is no `noin
by muglug 4y ago
Slack communicated about the breach here: https://slack.com/blog/news/slack-security-update https://slack.com/blog/news/slack-security-update
There is no `noindex` tag on that page (check the source).
There is a `noindex` tag on an alternate "en-gb" version of that page: https://slack.com/intl/en-gb/blog/news/slack-security-update https://slack.com/intl/en-gb/blog/news/slack-security-update
This is to be expected — it's presumably SEO equivalent to specifying a canonical URL.
- richardwhiuk 4y agoAbove poster is from Slack. That's not the standard SEO way of flagging a canonical URL.
- nightpool 4y agoSure, but it's a way less misleading comment then the original bleeping computer article, which mentions the "noindex" tag without ever mentioning that it was applied only to duplicate content.
- seti0Cha 4y agoIt's not unheard of either and likely makes very little difference in the actual discoverability of the document.