2 ms·
Yeah MS was hot on COM back then. Even JScript was a COM object IIRC. Agreed Netscape also introduced their own incompatibilities too, but Netscape didn’t have
by hnlmorg 4y ago
Yeah MS was hot on COM back then. Even JScript was a COM object IIRC.
Agreed Netscape also introduced their own incompatibilities too, but Netscape didn’t have a desktop monopoly. Though I do agree that IE4 was actually a really good product. If I recall correctly even IE3 loaded pages quicker than Netscape Navigator 3.
I really wanted to like Netscape Communicator but it was hard to overlook just how sluggish it was compared to IE.
As for front end development, I mostly an sysadmin back then but I did have a few websites live (my first being publish in 1994). I even won in the JavaScript category of Planet Source Code (remember that place?) one month for a recreation of the Windows desktop using JS. But I much preferred writing desktop software to web pages (and I still don’t really enjoy frontend dev all that much even now)
- pjmlp 4y agoFor those that have been living outside Windows, MS has been hot on COM since OLE 2.0 days. Not only are many .NET bindings for Win32, largely based on top of COM, WinDev has doubled down on COM since they rebooted Longhorn ideas into Windows Vista, and WinRT is nothing more than COM with another set of additional interfaces (TL;DR version, it is a bit more actually).