4 ms·
And yet it's the minimum we expect from our legal system, I don't understand why we are okay with corporations being exempt from that.
by poszlem 4y ago
And yet it's the minimum we expect from our legal system, I don't understand why we are okay with corporations being exempt from that.
- bunbun69 4y agoUsing GitHub is a privilege, not a right You should do your business elsewhere if you don't agree with GitHub TOS
- poszlem 4y agoI am not talking about the current situation. I am saying that it should not be legal for companies to refuse to server a customer without giving a clear reason why they do so. Unless you think it would be fine, for example, for corporations to refuse serving minorities citing their TOS?
- maximus-decimus 4y agoIf it's not a right, does that mean GitHub could ban every black user if they wanted to? I doubt it. Could they ban every Russian (or people of specific nationality in general)? Can they ban everybody sharing an idea? I'm really curious where the line is drawn.
- pca006132 4y agoOur legal system is really expensive, not sure if it is a good alternative to this. And perhaps you can hire a lawyer to sue them when they ban you, they will have to explain the exact TOS violation in the court I think?