4 ms·
Since you have the legal background can you explain how the CEO publicly stating in writing “Everyone exited was offered 3 months of severance, which is 50% mor
by roperj 4y ago
Since you have the legal background can you explain how the CEO publicly stating in writing “Everyone exited was offered 3 months of severance, which is 50% more than legally required.” is not actionable at all?
Also how is this definitely not a WARN act violation?
- ninth_ant 4y agoBlatantly lying in a public statement is not against the law, depending on the circumstances. Otherwise the man would already be in fairly deep trouble.
- borski 4y agoThere is nothing to signify that he isn’t already going to be in fairly deep trouble. He has been sanctioned and fined for past violations based on his tweets, for example by the SEC.
- s1artibartfast 4y agoTo start, for it to be actionable you need evidence that someone wasn't paid for their 60 or 90 days
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]