3 ms·
Human artists also use popular artist's work as training data
by thedorkknight 4y ago
Human artists also use popular artist's work as training data
- acdha 4y agoThere’s a big difference in how closely most people emulate other artists. Humans tend to want a distinct identify so it’s frowned on to use high skill to make something very similar, and they can only make new art relatively slowly. We’ve never had to consider industrial scale without the ethical concerns before.
- bb88 4y agoMy issue is that if someone has a remarkable new style, sure it's going to be copied by humans, but it takes time to do so. And usually the original artist becomes famous along the way -- perhaps even rich. Imagine a brand new artist who has a distinct style, but yet the art style is used to print 20,000 successful NFT rug pulls. If there was a market, there is no longer one anymore. I think that's the problem.
- baby 4y agoWhat's funny to me is that people are yelling at open source programs. This is a new kind of yelling at the clouds.
- chidg 4y agoThere's a major difference of scale. No individual human artist can reliably learn to copy every other artists' styles, and then produce infinite works in those styles.