2 ms·
That still is anticompetitive.
by cma 4y ago
That still is anticompetitive.
- exabrial 4y agoMeh I dunno, I'd take it
- mcronce 4y agoI think that's why the "bare minimum" language was used: It's a lot better than the status quo, but doesn't go far enough.
- h0l0cube 4y agoThe competition could still poach the employee for more money, if they deemed them worth it. Which is plain old competition.
- TulliusCicero 4y agoWell, maybe, but in practice companies would only rarely use it, since they wouldn't want to pay for someone to not do work.