4 ms·
This comment is confusing because you're talking about the article by a different author linked from the post, not the linked post itself.
by magicalist 4y ago
This comment is confusing because you're talking about the article by a different author linked from the post, not the linked post itself.
- BuckyBeaver 4y agoNo one else seems to be confused, but to be fair I didn't even remember that the HN post went to a tweet... or toot. However, the poster of that link seems to agree with the author of the core article.
- magicalist 4y ago> No one else seems to be confused you refer to "the author's revisionist history", sangnoir's comment in response says "the author also falsely claimed...", but these are referring to two different authors. > the poster of that link seems to agree with the author of the core article he literally wrote "While Chris is crisp about the problem and the consequences of not solving it, he doesn't have answers for why Google and Apple act the way they do" and proceeds to give a different history and background. > but to be fair I didn't even remember that the HN post went to a tweet... or toot so...you were confused.
- BuckyBeaver 4y agoNo, you were confused, as you said. About more than one thing, apparently.