> It may be dull, but it’s also anti-Semitic. Yes, so? That's relevant because antisemitism is wrong? Really, in a thread about banning books you bring up wron

> It may be dull, but it’s also anti-Semitic. Yes, so? That's relevant because antisemitism is wrong? Really, in a thread about banning books you bring up wrong ideas? > This strikes me as being complete nonsense. Anyway, citation needed. I could give you a citation, but you banned the source material, remember. That's double plus ironic because Hitler's work is absolutely full with vitriolic ramblings about how the Jewish media is spreading wrong ideas poisonous for the soul of the nation. "The bigger the lie, the most likely it is to be belived", he laments, and explicitly calls for the suppression of such speech. He would get to enact those ideas in a few short years. Antifascist activists who are looking at book bans as a weapon for their fight should probably take a good hard look in the mirror; they might see some disturbing semblance.