Not really. Sears and JcPenny's are desperate for customers, but they're not giving stuff away. The 10% return they get from liquidating the inventory and sto

Not really. Sears and JcPenny's are desperate for customers, but they're not giving stuff away. The 10% return they get from liquidating the inventory and store fixtures. Same here. Liquidating the vacant property, even at a net loss (which likely wouldn't be the case, if they've owned the property for more than a few years they likely would walk away net positive) would be the best course of action, not giving free rent to a billionaire.