2 ms·
The original article cited the SPLC, not the ADL, so this has literally nothing to do with the topic at hand except that the GP commenter's mind for some reason
by czx4f4bd 4y ago
The original article cited the SPLC, not the ADL, so this has literally nothing to do with the topic at hand except that the GP commenter's mind for some reason jumped to the ADL while trying to defend books about murdering Jews and other minorities.
- imwillofficial 4y agoHardly defending, I’m just no fan of censorship, including the authors book. What I don’t like is lists of books we accept as bad without reading them ourselves.