4 ms·

> So basically PHP, but in Go? You say that like it's a bad thing ;^)

• rad_gruchalski 4y ago
  Then why not <?go ... ?> instead of the random ^ soup?
  • paulsmith 4y ago
    Why is that better?
    • sunbum 4y ago
      Internationalization, not every keyboard has ^ easily accessible.
    • nablaone 4y ago
      Looks like other SSRs. FEDs will thank you. In real word HTML template are 90% DIVs, 10% generated content.
  • andrewgilmartin 4y ago
    Please, no. Let's not intermix <> code fragments with <> html elements. Have you witnessed the nightmare of reading and updating JSTL, for example?
    • rad_gruchalski 4y ago
      Meh, JSP and PHP do this already. JSP is of course <%… %>. ColdFusion does it all the time. It’s easier on the eye, especially with editor support, than having to scan for all those ^ characters. Anyway, my original comment was a take on “PHP but for Go”, and only half serious. I don’t see myself using the product discussed here. I hear the people who say “I disable JavaScript” but frankly I always write my apps so that the frontend part communicates with the backend via JSON API. I’m not a frontend dev…