3 ms·
I think it's interesting that the example you gave (despite being very outside the mainstream) didn't lead to too much side discussion and people mostly spoke t
by version_five 4y ago
I think it's interesting that the example you gave (despite being very outside the mainstream) didn't lead to too much side discussion and people mostly spoke to your question. While if you'd used more common example (one of any number of topics that doesn't permit dissent these days) you'd have been flagged into the stone age and had people either feign outrage or condescendingly explain why you're wrong and ignore your question. Ironically, it was a good example.
- Eisenstein 4y agoWhy do you assume this? I find it amusing that people 'outrage themselves' by taking something that didn't happen and use it as evidence that the thing that didn't happen would have happened, if the context were slightly different. Maybe instead of doing that, accept that the thing you expected to happen isn't what people want to do, regardless of if you think they do.