The person is not walking in to business meetings arguing the ethics of incest. Clearly they understand this given their declaration of a throwaway. I think it

The person is not walking in to business meetings arguing the ethics of incest. Clearly they understand this given their declaration of a throwaway. I think it's also probably safe to say they're not delivering these opinions as non-sequiturs. If there is some news article posted for discussion about incest, and I showed up to say "I don't like incest", I doubt I'd find anyone telling me about references to > 1840, The Corsair, “The Letter Bag of the Great Western,” pg. 775, col. 1 But look what seems to happen at the inverse? Make of the opinion what you will, but bashing the engagement is a bit rich. OP is just giving the outsiders perspective to the hivemind. It's worth hearing now and then imo.