> I understand the problem, but what better way do we currently have to measure its connection to reality? We can consider its responses to a broader range of

> I understand the problem, but what better way do we currently have to measure its connection to reality? We can consider its responses to a broader range of questions than those having an unambiguous and well-known answer. Its propensity for making up 'facts', and for fabricating 'explanations' that are incoherent or even self-contradictory shows that any apparent understanding of the world being represented in the text is illusory.