> If they enforced it 100% (or substantially closer to 100%) it would wind up getting changed to reflect reality That would be a good outcome. > that would be

> If they enforced it 100% (or substantially closer to 100%) it would wind up getting changed to reflect reality That would be a good outcome. > that would be counterproductive to the goals of everyone who complains it's not enforced enough. I don't agree at all. I want transparency, not deal-cutting for special-interests behind closed doors. That's a recipe for corruption. > people with side gigs and people with business income getting hit most frequently and hardest. It's not only about enforcement, even auditing the relevant people is not happening. At it is, the IRS doesn't even have the money to audit rich people[0]. Besides; the IRS could still decide to not target anyone making less than 250K. [0] https://www.gq.com/story/no-irs-audits-for-the-rich https://www.gq.com/story/no-irs-audits-for-the-rich