There are billions of flies who eat shit. Therefore, shit should be edible? The "numbers argument" is a fallacious one. No, "how you are supposed to distribut

There are billions of flies who eat shit. Therefore, shit should be edible? The "numbers argument" is a fallacious one. No, "how you are supposed to distribute a C library" is not my opinion, but the experience/observations of the last 50 years of engineering. Why would we even have a .so/.a/.lib/.dll format for libraries? As I said in a sibling comment, those are not header-only libraries. It's poorly packaged .c/.h in a single file that we happened to name with the .h extension. It's not a header, it's a header+implementation. And it's bad practice, and any decent C developer will tell you so.