9 ms·
Nearly everyone was exposed to COVID, despite news spreading about it far faster than it spread. COVID only killed under 1% or so of those exposed. But there
by pifm_guy 4y ago
Nearly everyone was exposed to COVID, despite news spreading about it far faster than it spread.
COVID only killed under 1% or so of those exposed. But there are plenty of diseases with far higher mortality. What makes you think we couldn't make something as deadly as rabies (kills 99%+ of those who get symptoms) but as transmissible as the common cold?
- xorcist 4y ago> COVID only killed under 1% Given that "nearly everyone" was exposed, that value is an order of magnitude too high, should you compare it with how many died the years before covid and during (but before vaccination was generally available) as fraction of the presumably exposed population. All of this is public data, but it probably makes sense to exclude countries with notoriously bad data such as China and India.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- bigDinosaur 4y agoIf a disease with 99% mortality that spreads like the common cold came into existence we would lock down everything as harshly as necessary until a vaccine/cure. That'd involve stopping all international flights and so on (and all domestic travel, and maybe even going out of your suburb). Covid wasn't deadly enough to justify enforcing the most drastic measures - a 99% mortality rate would justify them to almost everyone.
- ceejayoz 4y agoWhat if it takes 4-6 years to show symptoms like BSE?
- marmadukester39 4y agoWe’d be dead.