>As for ChatGPT “stealing” content: I’d rather take the view of aggregating human knowledge as a positive It may be positive for humanity in general but that w

>As for ChatGPT “stealing” content: I’d rather take the view of aggregating human knowledge as a positive It may be positive for humanity in general but that wasn't really the point that was made. It's a bad incentive for the individual knowledge creators. I suppose we could argue that it's high time that knowledge is less artificially guarded behind indiviual humans and that it gets a standardized format and available for instant query. That "format" is therefore the knowledge graph/db of the chatgpt trained model. Maybe the answer here is that the AI programmers need to figure out a way to link to the original creators so that you can at least look at the source of the knowledge. Surely that should be doable. Because I may trust the ChatGPT3 bot a lot but maybe I also want to check out the forum link where it thinks it accumulated the trained data piece that resulted in its answer. And if that list of links is extremely long then so be it, show me ranked source links of 500 websites. It will be no different than looking at a google search.