I agree it is a quantitative difference at its core but cheap automation can dramatically lower the signal to noise. Crossing a certain quality threshold may ev

I agree it is a quantitative difference at its core but cheap automation can dramatically lower the signal to noise. Crossing a certain quality threshold may eventually precipitate binary behavioral changes for users (i.e. conclude that certain online tools are unusable / untrustworthy) I also agree that authoritative sources become critical. Yet those typically rely on very human assessments (with their own pitfals and controversies) and in any case much more slow / costly to develop. How exactly this all will play out is not clear (to me). But the naive technosolutionism of deploying "AI at scale" and believing that it will just work as advertised seems misplaced. The human condition is very reflexive.