I found ChatGPTs answers relatively accurate for explaining programming related queries, feeding it documentation and asking questions related to that, etc. But

I found ChatGPTs answers relatively accurate for explaining programming related queries, feeding it documentation and asking questions related to that, etc. But I've also tried to use it for travel and health related queries. For travel queries, it confidently tells me the wrong information, "Do most restaurants in Chiang Mai accept credit cards?" got "Yes, most restaurants in Chiang Mai accept credit cards!", which is completely false. Also got wildly inaccurate information about the quality of drinking water. And for health related queries, it tells me the same weasel-worded BS that I get on health spam blogs. I tried to dig out more information regarding sources of both travel and health related information, but ChatCPT simply said it doesn't know the details of the sources of information. I think a new implementation of ChatGPT is worth exploring though, one that cites sources and gives links to further information, and also one that has the ability to somehow validate it's responses for accuracy.