3 ms·
> Funny how you're getting downvoted. Maybe because those users are outside the US with reasonably-good, (nearly) spam-free cellular infrastructure with compan
by zinekeller 4y ago
> Funny how you're getting downvoted.
Maybe because those users are outside the US with reasonably-good, (nearly) spam-free cellular infrastructure with companies and regulators that actually cared, and so were confused with the assertion that is not applicable globally?
- cmrdporcupine 4y agoIt's the actual sound quality of cellular comms vs classic analog phone comms that's the issue. AFAIK this is pretty much universal internationally. Noise canceling + basically half duplex sound, high latency, low quality in general, it's not what it used to be. It used to be easier and pleasant to talk to people, now it's a chore.