> It's always a shame when content is banned based on who wrote it (or didn't write it), rather than the actual content. Yes in theory. In practise in this cas

> It's always a shame when content is banned based on who wrote it (or didn't write it), rather than the actual content. Yes in theory. In practise in this case specifically the problem is often that it is very difficult to judge the quality of the actual content in and of itself. This is already a problem for stackoverflow, and you will see many highly-upvoted incorrect answers to questions with correct answers languishing. Having AI-generated plausible answers to everything would likely further muddy the waters.