3 ms·
You've just demonstrated that our society is insane (at least in this case). If we were not crazy, what harm could such a copy possibly do ? None. You effect
by loup-vaillant 15y ago
You've just demonstrated that our society is insane (at least in this case).
If we were not crazy, what harm could such a copy possibly do ? None. You effectively (though unwillingly) donated your knowledge to the world. You deserve even more than if you kept your code secret.
But.
By "donating", you lost leverage. You can no longer threaten people with not giving them what they want if they don't pay you.
This is by the way the problem with basically everything: making something abundant will add actual value, while at the same time destroying market value. It is most visible with Free Software, (vs Proprietary Software), but applies to anything. Say for instance that we could copy food the way we copy software.
Conclusion: our society in general (and the market in particular), is very poor at valuing things in the face of abundance. Somehow it needs scarcity. Paraphrasing In Time, "For a few to be wealthy, many must starve". I don't have a solution, but this is nuts.
- GHFigs 15y agoThere are other words for "unwilling donation".
- earbitscom 15y agoNuts is saying that an artist trying to extract value from things they create is "threatening people". God forbid you be "threatened" with not having a copy of the latest Coldplay album. The fact that you liken it to starving, indeed, indicates our society may have slipped into the grips of insanity.