Big deficiencies aren't monetizable by adversaries, tiny ones are (eg, impacting it's response to questions about one topic in particular). In a very narrow ni

Big deficiencies aren't monetizable by adversaries, tiny ones are (eg, impacting it's response to questions about one topic in particular). In a very narrow niche there may not be many documents to pick from, either. I don't think you can just automate this away in the context of generalized search. Search has to fulfill every niche; that seems like an indefensible position (strategically speaking, not in the moral sense). How can you benchmark bias in every niche? Your benchmarks show your reasoning is sound; what about the premises you're reasoning from? In the context of something narrowly scoped like a customer service bot, it makes sense to me how you could build expertise in constraining the model's output. But in terms of everything? But I'll admit I don't have a crystal ball, happy to eat my words if they can operate with enough traffic and got long enough to attract the attention of spammers, and still keep them at bay. I think this space is stagnant and needs to be shaken up, and that chat interfaces have potential, so I'm not trying to be a hater. I just think this is gunnuh be a very difficult aspect.