3 ms·
The one (using it to give another option for working) doesn't imply the other (consenting to increased monitoring).
by mellosouls 4y ago
The one (using it to give another option for working) doesn't imply the other (consenting to increased monitoring).
- wahnfrieden 4y agoalready commonplace for employers to track mouse movement and the like for monitoring remote workers, sometimes to have video requirements as well (where video is not just another option to work with colleagues but a policy requirement so that managers/owners can surveil), because that's what they're able to track with the tech within a laptop. give them more sensors and they won't leave it to workers to decide (except to decide to leave those jobs in search of ones that surveil less). workers can organize against these conditions but it's not left to individual consent.