2 ms·
The problem is that we dont exactly need ar/vr: we can put screens around for a fraction of the cost, and video games are nice to sit down: we can run after eac
by xwolfi 4y ago
The problem is that we dont exactly need ar/vr: we can put screens around for a fraction of the cost, and video games are nice to sit down: we can run after each other while giggling in the forest if we want some movement fun and dont exactly need anything overlayed.
I can understand they try to see far to anticipate a future where they'd make a lot of money being useful, but there's such low latency and richness of perception with normal atomic real world interactions that I'm not sure we can or want to replace it with something that simply adds a paid intermediary.
It s like adding a blockchain to transact cash for instance.