> But my experience with my Meta Quest Pro is that it's more for getting a vague idea of your surroundings than just interacting with them. The point of the ar

> But my experience with my Meta Quest Pro is that it's more for getting a vague idea of your surroundings than just interacting with them. The point of the article is that this experience, while good, is juxtaposed with Meta's marketing claim that it's a mixed reality device. You're saying the device is good at the thing the author says it was probably built for. Mixed reality implies that you're seamlessly switching between environments, as if there wasn't a distinction.