3 ms·
It is written in a humorous style, but I don't take it as a joke. How is this fundamentally different than GPT code completion, other than it's data instead of
by danbmil99 4y ago
It is written in a humorous style, but I don't take it as a joke. How is this fundamentally different than GPT code completion, other than it's data instead of code?
I suspect our intuition tells us code will be verified first by a programmer, then by the language parser, whereas data is likely to be manipulated without human scrutiny.
Does anyone seriously believe that this will forever be the case?
- grp000 4y agoYou CAN'T close pandora's box, but you CAN make jokes about pandora's box.
- HyperSane 4y ago"but I don't take it as a joke" That's a problem, because it that is what it is.
- voxic11 4y ago> Hopefully you can see this is not meant to be serious. Contributions to make it serious aren't really the idea. Contributions to make it sillier or more audacious are the idea. Silly examples are also welcome. Read the readme...
- TuringTest 4y agoThe joke is that this is fundamentally the same as GPT code completion, yet people uses that to create production code.